Rejected Draw Offer Sparks Sportsmanship Debate in Manchester Test
The fourth Test between India and England at Old Trafford ended in a predictable draw, but not before a dramatic and tense final hour sparked a heated debate about sportsmanship, personal milestones, and the unwritten rules of the game. The controversy was ignited when England captain Ben Stokes offered to end the match early, an offer the Indian batters on the crease, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, chose to decline.
Follow our WhatsApp Channel for the latest news, alerts & updates – Don’t miss out!
The Offer and the On-Field Drama
With the match heading for an inevitable draw on the final day, and with the last hour of play about to commence, Ben Stokes approached the Indian pair and offered a handshake to call the game off. At the time, Jadeja was batting on 89 and Sundar on 80. The Indian batters refused the offer, opting to continue batting to reach their respective centuries.
What followed was a slightly surreal passage of play. In an effort to protect his frontline bowlers from unnecessary exertion and potential injury in a dead rubber, Stokes resorted to using part-time, occasional bowlers like Harry Brook. The stump microphone captured the on-field tension, with Stokes reportedly asking Jadeja if he wanted to score a century against part-time bowlers. The Indian players, in turn, questioned why they should simply walk off when they had earned their position.
Milestones Achieved Amid Criticism
The decision paid off for the Indian duo. Ravindra Jadeja brought up his second Test century with a six, and Washington Sundar went on to score his maiden Test hundred. However, the manner in which these milestones were achieved drew criticism. Former England captain Michael Atherton described the final phase of bowling as "farcical," while legendary Indian batter Sunil Gavaskar, on commentary, noted the lack of applause from the English players and questioned their own tactics of batting deep into their first innings.
Captains Explain Their own Logic
After the match, both captains addressed the unusual situation. Indian captain Shubman Gill defended his players, stating that the decision was left to the batters in the middle. "We thought they batted brilliantly," Gill said. "Both of them were on the 90s (actually 80s), so we thought they deserved a century there."
Ben Stokes explained his decision was purely pragmatic. "There was absolutely no chance I was going to risk any of my big fast bowlers through injuries with one more game to go," he said, citing the heavy workload his bowlers had already endured. He acknowledged that the Indian batters had played "incredibly well" to save the game.
In the end, the incident provided a fascinating glimpse into the modern game's competing priorities. It pitted the pragmatic, team-first approach of protecting key assets against the deeply personal and career-defining pursuit of a Test century. While the match itself will be remembered as a draw, the tense final hour has left the cricket world with a compelling and complex debate to ponder.
