Health worker at Muniguda CHC caught taking bribe

Prameyanews English

Published By : Bratati Baral | August 13, 2025 2:38 PM

According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.

Rayagada, August 13: In a swift operation, Odisha Vigilance on Wednesday apprehended Sri Kunja Bihari Rout, a Male Health Worker (MHW) cum Clerk posted at the Community Health Centre (CHC) in Muniguda, Rayagada district, while accepting a bribe of ₹3,000 from a complainant in exchange for issuing a birth certificate.

According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.

Acting on the complaint, a Vigilance team laid a trap and caught Rout red-handed in his office while accepting the second installment of ₹3,000. The entire tainted money was recovered from his possession and seized.

Following the arrest, simultaneous searches are underway at two of Rout’s premises to investigate any disproportionate assets. A case has been registered against him under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, at the Koraput Vigilance Police Station (Case No. 27/2025).

Investigation is ongoing. Further details are awaited.

Prameya English Is Now On WhatsApp Join And Get Latest News Updates Delivered To You Via WhatsApp

You Might Also Like

More From Related News
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.
According to Vigilance officials, Rout had demanded a total bribe of ₹6,000 from a poor farmer for processing the birth certificate of his son. The complainant had already paid ₹3,000 earlier, but Rout allegedly continued to insist on the remaining amount. Left with no alternative, the complainant approached the Vigilance department, alleging harassment and bribery.

Copyright © 2024 - Summa Real Media Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.