ଓଡ଼ିଆ | ENGLISH
ଓଡ଼ିଆ | ENGLISH

hardcore-woman-maoist-surrenders-in-malkangiri

Published By : Satya Mohapatra
hardcore-woman-maoist-surrenders-in-malkangiri

Predictable pre-seeding system sparks outrage as top performing teams face elimination

Cricket enthusiasts and experts are expressing deep frustration over the structure of the upcoming Super 8 stage in the T20 World Cup 2026. This wave of disapproval stems from the International Cricket Council’s "pre-seeding" strategy, which has unintentionally grouped the most successful teams together. As the initial round concluded, it became clear that the four teams finishing at the top of their respective tables have all been funneled into a single group.

Specifically, Group 1 is now a "group of death," featuring India, Zimbabwe, West Indies, and South Africa. These nations all emerged as winners in the opening phase. Conversely, Group 2 is composed entirely of teams that finished as runners-up, including Pakistan, Sri Lanka, England, and New Zealand. This lopsided arrangement means that two of the tournament’s best-performing sides will be knocked out before reaching the semi-finals, while teams with weaker opening records enjoy an easier path forward.

Under this controversial system, rankings were determined before a single ball was bowled to assist with travel and venue planning. For instance, South Africa is treated as a lower seed despite winning their group, simply because New Zealand—who finished second—was pre-assigned a higher rank. This approach effectively removes the competitive reward for finishing first and diminishes the excitement of the final group-stage matches.

Logistical issues have also drawn fire, particularly regarding co-host Sri Lanka. Even though they are playing on home soil, the fixed bracket dictates they must travel to India if they qualify for the semi-finals. This denies local fans in Colombo the chance to support their team during the most critical stage of the event. While the ICC maintains that these measures are necessary for managing a tournament across two nations, critics argue that sporting integrity is being sacrificed for administrative convenience.