SC refuses to transfer Guru Granth Sahib sacrilege trial outside Punjab
Published By : Prameya News Bureau | November 25, 2020 IST
Share
New Delhi, Nov 25: The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to transfer the 2015 Bathinda Guru Granth Sahib sacrilege case trial outside Punjab. A bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy said: "The transfer of trial from one state to another would inevitably reflect on the credibility of the state's judiciary. Except for compelling factors and clear situation of deprivation of fair justice, the transfer power should not be invoked. The present bunch of cases are not perceived to be amongst such exceptional categories." The top court dismissed a petition filed by six accused, who are members of Dera Sacha Sauda sect, expressing apprehension of prejudice in the trial in Punjab. According to the petitioners, the situation in Bhatinda and other places is "communally surcharged" and a fair trial is a near impossibility. The transfer petition was led by Jatinderveer Arora and others seeking transfer of trial pending before the courts at Bhatinda, Moga and Faridkot districts to Delhi or to any nearby state. The top court observed that the allegation of surcharged atmosphere is not sufficient and the apprehension of not getting a fair and impartial trial cannot be founded on certain grievances or convenience of the accused, and the reasons have to be more compelling. "When relative convenience and difficulties of all the parties involved in the process are taken into account, the conclusion is inevitable that no credible case for transfer of trial to alternative venues outside the State of Punjab is made out, in the present matters," noted the top court. Justice Roy emphasised that from the available material, it cannot be reasonably concluded that the situation in Punjab is not conducive for a fair trial for the petitioners. "The few instances mentioned by the petitioners' counsel may suggest heightened feelings amongst different groups but they do not, in my estimation, call for transfer of proceedings to another state," he held. The top court observed that it is inclined to believe that the atmosphere in the state does not justify shifting of the trial venue to another state, noting that the incident occurred in 2015 and it has been more than two years since the petitioners were arraigned as accused in the cases. "During this long period, no complaint has been made by the petitioners of any threat to their security or to their associates," noted the top court. (IANS)
News7 Is Now On WhatsApp Join And Get Latest News Updates Delivered To You Via WhatsApp
You Might Also Like
More From Related News
Western media chooses to ignore legitimacy of huge electoral mandate
BJP sponsors opinion polls, don’t believe these surveys: Mamata Banerjee
Pinarayi Vijayan has joined hands with BJP to attack my brother: Priyanka Gandhi
Soumya Vishwanathan murder case: Mother of slain scribe moves SC against bail granted to 4 convicts
Central Government announces election of 11 members Veterinary Council of India
37 Indian startups secure $310 million in funding this week
Neha’s murder not a case of love jihad: Siddaramaiah
Congress Leader Tajinder Singh Bittu resigns from Party
LS Poll 2024: PM Modi set to embark on campaign trail in Maharashtra & Karnataka today
BSF seizes Chinese-Made drone & heroin packet near Indo-Pak Border
Patient awareness and interaction programme marks World Liver Day at AIIMS Bhubaneswar
Air India suspends flights to Tel Aviv till April 30 over Iran-Israel conflict
Vice Admiral Dinesh Kumar Tripathi appointed next Chief of Ind. Navy
Air India suspends flights to and from Dubai till April 21
Lok Sabha polls: BJP expecting its 'best show in South', says HM Amit Shah
Senior IPS officer Nalin Prabhat appointed as new NSG DG
Lok Sabha polls: World’s tiniest woman casts vote in Nagpur
Tamil Nadu records 12.5 pc voting in first two hours
Lok Sabha polls: PM Modi links 'dholak', Mohd Shami with Amroha's pride
Lok Sabha polls: 15 pc voter turnout recorded in MP's six LS seats in first two hours